Beck Hopelessness Scale Manual

17-08-2021
 |  [RAND-100] - Comments

  • 20 such that higher scores reflect higher levels of hopelessness. Scores ranging from: 0 to 3 as are considered within the normal range, 4 to 8 identify mild hopelessness, scores from 9 to 14 identify moderate hopelessness, and scores greater than 14 identify severe hopelessness (Beck & Steer, 1988). Language availability: English.
  • Indicator related to statement on whether the subject looks forward to the future with hope and enthusiasm, as part of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) Notes: Q1; 1 point added for a.
  • BHS, Beck hopelessness scale: Manual Unknown Binding – January 1, 1988 by Aaron T Beck (Author) See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions.

Beck Institute for Cognitive Behavior Therapy One Belmont Avenue, Suite 700 Bala Cynwyd, PA Tel: 610-664-3020; Fax: 610-709-5336 Email: info@beckinstitute.org; Website: www.beckinstitute.org ©1980 by J.

Special recommendations for administering the BHS via telepractice


» Get general information about telepractice from Pearson Clinical Assessment.

The telepractice information below is intended to support professionals in making informed, well-reasoned decisions around remote assessment. This information is not intended to be comprehensive regarding all considerations for assessment via telepractice. It should not be interpreted as a requirement or recommendation to conduct assessment via telepractice.

Professionals should remain mindful to:

  • Follow professional best practice recommendations and respective ethical codes
  • Follow telepractice regulations and legal requirements from federal, state and local authorities, licensing boards, professional liability insurance providers, and payors
  • Develop competence with assessment via telepractice through activities such as practicing, studying, consulting with other professionals, and engaging in professional development.

Professionals should use their clinical judgment to determine if assessment via telepractice is appropriate for a particular examinee, referral question, and situation. There are circumstances where assessment via telepractice is not feasible and/or is contraindicated. Documentation of all considerations, procedures, and conclusions remains a professional responsibility.

Special recommendations for administering the BHS via telepractice.

Administering any of the Beck Scales in a telepractice context can be accomplished utilizing the On-Screen Administration (OSA) or Remote On-Screen Administration (R-OSA) function of Q-global® , Pearson’s secure online testing and scoring platform.. Details regarding the system and how it is used are provided on the Q-global product page.

Conducting a valid assessment in a telepractice modality requires an understanding of the interplay of a number of complex issues. In addition to the general information on our telepractice overview page noted above, professionals should address five themes (Eichstadt et al. 2013) when planning for administering the Beck Scales via telepractice: For more information on the five themes, please visit our general telepractice web page.


Theme-specific information for forced-choice assessment administrations and the BHS


1. Audio/visual environment

  • If you require video viewing during the administration, make sure the full face of the examinee is in view.
  • If you require audio interaction during the administration, make sure the audio is working as expected. Test the audio prior to the administration either through the examinee’s speakers or headset and ensure a high-quality audio environment is present.
  • Make sure the examinee's environment is free from distractions.


2. Examiner factors

  • Practice the mechanics and workflow of assigning, starting, and completing the assessment using the On-Screen Administration capabilities of Q-global (or Remote On-Screen if being used) before you go through this process with an examinee so that you are familiar with the administration procedures.
  • If you are asking the examinee to complete the assessment during a telepractice session while you are observing virtually, please note the audio/visual environment information above, and ensure that the session is set up appropriately to elicit a valid response from the examinee. Be sure to also ensure that the test taking session mimics an in-person session as closely as possible.


3. Examinee factors

  • Please ensure that a remote assessment administration is appropriate for the client and for the purpose of the assessment.
  • Ensure that examinee is able and prepared to appropriately engage in the testing session and that they are well rested, can adequately attend to the test, and are ready to fully participate in the test session.
  • There may be some administrations where an examinee headset is not appropriate or feasible. In these instances, make sure you have a web camera with an embedded microphone or a standalone microphone with the volume turned up to a comfortable level.


4. Test/test materials

Bhs Beck Hopelessness Scale Manual

  • Ask the examinee to close all other applications on the computer, laptop, or other device for faster administration performance.
  • Monitor the test session and the examinee's interaction with the test materials to ensure confidentiality and test session integrity as appropriate

5. Other/miscellaneous

Beck
  • If you are administering the test using the On-Screen Administration (OSA) function of Q-global while the client is in a remote location, it may be advisable that an e-Helper (para-professional) is onsite with the client to assist with logging in and starting the assessment if the examinee's computer is controlling the session, or to ensure that the appropriate client response is captured if the assessment is being administered via screen sharing/video-conferencing capabilities.
  • The e-Helper should also be trained in and able to provide emergency assistance should it be required during the test session for any reason, including if the examinee should show any indication of personal distress during the assessment.
  • Always state in your report that the test was administered via telepractice, and briefly describe the method of telepractice used. For example, 'The BHS was administered by remote on-screen administration through the Q-global system, and the examiner's assistant monitored the administration using a live video connection'.
  • Make a clinical judgment, similar to a face-to-face session, whether or not you are able to gather the examinee's best performance. Report your clinical decision(s) in your report and comment on the factors that led to this decision and your reporting or lack of reporting of the scores. For example, 'The remote testing environment appeared free of distractions, adequate rapport was established with the examinee via video and s/he appeared appropriately engaged in the task throughout the session. No significant technological problems were noted during administration, and the results are considered to be a valid estimate of the examinee's skills/abilities'
Selected research to date

Please refer to the following studies regarding the appropriateness of administering forced-choice assessments via computer or other electronic means.

Chuah et al (2006). Personality Assessment: Does the Medium Matter? No. Journal of Research in Personality, 40-4, 339-376.

Butcher, J., Perry, J., & Hahn, J. (2004). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.

Pinsoneault, Terry B. (1996) Equivalency of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil administered version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2.Computers in Human Behavior, 12-2, 291-300.

Russell M. et al (2003). Computer-Based Testing and Validity: A Look Back and into the Future. Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College

Studies supporting the equivalency of test scores when picture stimuli are displayed to the examinee in a printed manual versus a digital display on a computer screen (in-person administration):

Daniel, M. H., Wahlstrom, D., & Zhou, X. (2014). Equivalence of Q-interactive and paper administrations of language tasks: Selected CELF-5 tests. Q-interactive Technical Report 7. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.

Daniel, M. H. (2012a). Equivalence of Q-interactive administered cognitive tasks: WAIS–IV. Q-interactive Technical Report 1. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.

Daniel, M. H. (2012b). Equivalence of Q-interactive administered cognitive tasks: WISC–IV. Q-interactive Technical Report 2. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.

Conclusion

Provided that you have thoroughly considered and addressed all the factors and specific considerations listed above, the examiner should be prepared to comment about the reliable and valid delivery of the test via remote delivery. Document in your report that the administration was completed by telepractice.

You may use the BHS via telepractice without additional permission from Pearson in the following published context:

  • BHS On-Screen Administration (OSA) or Remote On-Screen Administration (ROSA) via Q-global [tests with OSA/ROSA options] (3/18/2020)

Any other use of the BHS via telepractice requires prior permission from Pearson.

Basic description

  • Published in 1974
  • Can be used as a predictor of eventual suicide

Beck AT

Copyright
To quantify hopelessness or negative expectations about the future
  • Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
Therapeutic indication
  • Depression
  • Suicidal Ideation
The BHS was also used with patients diagnosed with various psychiatric disorders
  • PRO
  • English for the USA
Translations
3 translation(s)
Bibliographic reference(s) of the original questionnaire

Beck Depression Inventory Manual

Beck A.T. (1988). 'Beck Hopelessness Scale.' The Psychological Corporation

Beck AT & Steer RA (1993). Manual for the Beck Hopelessness Scale. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation

Beck Hopelessness Scale Manual Pdf

Beck AT, Weissman A, Lester D, Trexler L. The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974 Dec;42(6):861-5 (Abstract)

Beck Depression Inventory

Beck AT, Steer RA, Kovacs M, Garrison B. Hopelessness and eventual suicide: a 10-year prospective study of patients hospitalized with suicidal ideation. Am J Psychiatry. 1985 May;142(5):559-63 (Pubmed abstract)

Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown G. Dysfunctional attitudes and suicidal ideation in psychiatric outpatients. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1993 Spring;23(1):11-20 (Pubmed abstract)

Beck AT, Steer RA, Beck JS, Newman CF. Hopelessness, depression, suicidal ideation, and clinical diagnosis of depression. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1993 Summer;23(2):139-45 (Pubmed abstract)

Beck Hopelessness Scale Questions

Beck AT, Brown GK, Steer RA, Dahlsgaard KK, Grisham JR. Suicide ideation at its worst point: a predictor of eventual suicide in psychiatric outpatients. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1999 Spring;29(1):1-9 (Pubmed abstract)